Need for after-school programs





Home






About Us





Sitemap





Calendar





Events






Media

                               The
Overall Need for our Programs

 


Learn About…

 

 




Our Programs

 

 



Program Model

 

 



Program Levels

 

 




Need for Programs

 

 


 

Why
Dallas

Needs After-School Programs


 


The
Washington State Institute for Public Policy

The Washington State
Institute for Public Policy finds that effective after-school programs can
yield a benefit-to-cost ratio to taxpayers and crime victims of $1.87 to
$5.29 for every dollar spent.
[1]
 

Center for
the Study and Prevention of Violence

The
Quantum Opportunities after-school program produced $3 in benefits for every
$1 spent, without even counting the savings from an 85% drop in crime by boys
in the program. 

Rose
Institute

The Rose Institute finds
that quality after-school programs can reduce costs related to welfare,
crime, and education (remediation services and grade repetition) for an
average net benefit of between $79,484 and $119,427 per participant.
[2]


      

Participation in the Quantum Opportunities Program led to
higher rates of graduation: 63% of QOP participants graduated high school
compared to 42% of the control group.
[3]


Gansk & Associates

Gains in standardized test scores in reading and math
were greater for students participating in Foundations after-school programs
than for comparable students, according to a study of 19 elementary schools
in five states.
[4]


 UCLA Center for the
Study of Evaluation

In the initial year of study, LA�s BEST students began
with math achievement scores that were significantly lower than
non-participants. After long-term participation in the after-school program,
these students increased their test scores to be comparable to their peers.
[5] 

After participating in the 21st Century
Community Learning Centers program, black and Hispanic students reduced
tardiness to class and increased math scores compared to non-participants.
[6]

 


National Research Council

Students who reported spending no time in a
school-sponsored activity (after school) versus students spending 1-4 hours
in such activities were 57 percent more likely to have dropped out before
reaching the 12th grade.
[7]

 


After-school programs keep kids safe and out
of trouble while parents work.

Juvenile violent crime peaks between 3:00 p.m. and 4:00
p.m., the hour after school ends.
[8]

The violent
victimization of juveniles peaks at 3:00 p.m. Juveniles are at the highest
risk of being victimized before 6:00 p.m.
[9]

Students with a high level of participation are less
likely than non-participants to engage in problem behavior, such as being
arrested, taking drugs, engaging in teen sex, smoking, and drinking.
[11]

Parents and students find the safety of the after-school
program far superior to the safety within the neighborhood.
[12]

       


After-school programs receive
widespread public support.


 


According to a nationwide survey of 800 registered voters
in August of 2002:

Nine in ten voters believe there is a need for
children to have some type of organized activity or a place to go after
school that provides opportunities to learn.
[13] 

Ninety-five percent of parents with children in
after-school programs believe that their children are �safer and less likely
to be involved in juvenile crime than children who are not in after-school
programs.�
[14]



[1]

Aos, S., P. Phipps, R. Barnoski, and R. Lieb (2001). The Comparative
Costs and Benefits of Programs to Reduce Crime.
Olympia, WA: Washington
State Institute for Public Policy, 15. Available at on-line at
http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/crime/pdf/costbenefit.pdf.



[2]

Brown, W., S.B. Frates, I.S. Rudge, R.L. Tradewell (2002). The Costs and
Benefits of After School Programs: The Estimated Effects of the After School
Education and Safety Act of 2002.
Claremont, CA: Rose Institute, 20.
Available on-line at

http://rose.research.claremontmckenna.edu/publications/pdf/after_school.pdf.



[3]


Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence (2002).
Blueprints Model Programs: Quantum
Opportunities Program (QOP).

Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention
of Violence,


Institute of Behavioral
Science
,


University of Colorado at
Boulder
. [On-line].

http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/model/programs/QOP.html
.



[4]

Klein, S.P., R. Bolus (2002). Improvements in Math and Reading Scores of
Students Who Did and Did Not Participate in the Foundations After School
Enrichment Program During the 2001-2002 School Year.
Santa Monica, CA:
Gansk & Associates, 12. A summary of this report is available on-line at
http://www.foundationsinc.org/ExtendedDayFolder/conclusions.asp.



[6]

Dynarski, M., C. Pistorino, M. Moore, T. Silva, J.  Mullens, J. Deke, P.
Gleason, W. Mansfield, S. James-Burdumy, S. Heaviside, L. Rosenberg, D. Levy
(2003). When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the
21st-Century Community Learning Centers Program.
Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Education, xii and 71. Available on-line at
http://www.ed.gov/pubs/21cent/firstyear/.



[7]

National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2001). Community
Programs to Promote Youth Development
. Committee on Community-Level
Programs For Youth. Jacquelynne Eccles and Jennifer A Gootman, eds. Board on
Children, Youth, and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences
and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 30. Available on-line
at
http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072751/html/.



[8]

Snyder, H.N., and M. Sickmund (1999). Juvenile Offenders and Victims:
1999 National Report
. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, 64. Available on-line at
http://www.ncjrs.org/html/ojjdp/nationalreport99/toc.html.



[9]

Ibid., 34.



[10]


Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
[On-line].


http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/blueprints/model/programs/QOP.html
.



[11]

National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, 30.



[12]

Huang et al., 14.



[13]

Lake Snell Perry & Associates, Terrance Group, and Afterschool Alliance.
�American Voters: Afterschool Must Remain a Priority.� Afterschool Alert
Poll Report
. Washington, DC: Afterschool Alliance, 1. Available on-line
at
http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/school_poll_final_2002.pdf.



[14]

Ibid., 2.

 

Camp Fire USA builds caring, confident youth
and future leaders. For more information, please contact:

Phillip Lovell, Director of Public Policy,
at 202 347 2003 or [email protected]

 

 




[home]

Camp Fire USA Lone Star
Council
4411 Skillman Dallas, Texas 75206

Telephone: 214 824 1122 |
Fax: 214 824 1148 | E-mail:

[email protected]

The Impact of After-School Programs

 


After-school programs help kids achieve in
school.




[5]


Huang, Denise., B. Gribbons, K.S. Kim, C.
Lee, and E.L. Baker (2000). A Decade of Results: The Impact of LA�s BEST
After School Enrichment Program on Subsequent Student Achievement and
Performance.
Los Angeles, CA: UCLA
Center for the Study of
Evaluation, Graduate
School of Education & Information Studies, 9. Available on-line at
http://www.lasbest.org/learn/uclaeval.pdf.

Click For More Info On:


Overall

Impact of After-school Programs

Why We Need
Camp Fire USA
‘s
After-School Programs


Center for the Study and
Prevention of Violence


Mathematica, Inc.


 


Department of Justice


Participation in
the Quantum Opportunities Program led to fewer arrests among participants:

19%
of QOP


members were arrested compared to 23% of the
control group.
[10]


 National Research Council


UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation

After-school programs are a
cost-effective federal investment.



Center for the Study and Prevention of
Violence





Programs





Contact Us







Pages

Categories

  • No categories


[about us]


[programs]


[need for programs]


[calendar]


[events]


[media]

[careers]

[donate]


[contact us]